Legal Opinion

Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1989No. Nos. 87-1570, 87-1779PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

Lowell Staats Mining Company (Staats) brings two separate appeals arising out of one case in the district court. These appeals were consolidated. Staats claims the federal district court erred in granting the defendants’ petition to remove the case from the Colorado state district court based on diversity jurisdiction, and in dismissing the claims against all defendants as barred by res judicata. This opinion discusses each appeal separately. Having considered the parties’ arguments we affirm.

Staats originally brought a suit against Pioneer Uravan, Inc. wherein the jury…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Deflon v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lowell Staats Mining Company, Inc. v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Antelope Co. v. Mobil Rocky Mountain, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Consumers Gas & Oil, Inc. v. Farmland Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API