Legal Opinion
Antelope Co. v. Mobil Rocky Mountain, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 2001No. 99CA2366PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
Plaintiffs, Antelope Company, the An-schutz Family Foundation, and Piedmont Minerals Company (the royalty owners), appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment. Defendant, Mobil Rocky Mountain, Inc. (Mobil), cross-appeals an order denying it the defense of collateral estoppel. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. Background
This case is the latest in a series of lawsuits concerning the payment of royalties from sales of natural gas extracted pursuant to an oil, gas, and mineral lease (the lease). The lease pertains to a large tract of land along the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Compass Insurance Co. v. City of LittletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Bebo Construction Co. v. Mattox & O'Brien, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. SharpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Porcell v. Lincoln Wood Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Union Insurance Co. v. HottensteinColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bryant v. Lynch (In Re Lynch)District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Keller v. DavidsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.