Lindhout v. Brochu & Hass
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.
Brochu & Hass, employer, and General Casualty & Surety Company, insurer, dé fendants, appeal from the award of the department of labor and industry, to John Lindhout, employee and plaintiff, for the loss of an eye. A piece of steel, chipped from a hammer, penetrated the cornea of the plaintiff’s eye while he was at work at his trade of tool and die maker, and was removed with a magnet. A cataract developed and was subsequently removed by an operation. The eyesight of the injured eye was destroyed, but with the use of a proper lens the vision was restored and increased about 25 per cent.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Liimatta v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Hayes v. Motor Wheel CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Powers v. Motor Wheel Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Suggs v. Ternstedt Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Banker v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by15 opinions
- Miller v. Sullivan Milk Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Rench v. Kalamazoo Stove & Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Mitchell v. Metal Assemblies, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Marrs v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Bilsky v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.