Banker v. Chevrolet Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I am unable to agree that the decision of the department of labor and industry shall be reversed in this case. The department recognized the rules of law laid down by this court in eye cases, and appreciated that the instant case was a close and difficult one on the facts. The department found on the facts that the plaintiff did not have a useful vision to lose, and, treating the case as purely one of fact and adopting a reasonable construction of the language used by the witnesses, most of whom were medical experts, disallowed plaintiff's claim. If there is any testimony in the record to…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Henderson v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Neal v. Stuart Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Lindhout v. Brochu & HassMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Weaver v. Budd Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Powers v. Motor Wheel Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931