Legal Opinion

Marrs v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1946No. Docket No. 43, Calendar No. 43,166PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

John Marrs, plaintiff herein, claims that on July 31, 1943, while working for the Ford Motor Company, defendant, lie suffered a hemorrhage of the right eye, which in turn precipitated a secondary glaucoma, causing, total loss of vision of the eye. The department of labor and industry denied him compensation, finding that due to a previous removal of a cataract resulting in the loss of binocular vision (the ability to coordinate the vision of the eyes), he had already lost the vision of the eye prior to July 31, 1943. Plaintiff appeals claiming that prior to July 31, 1943, he still had useful…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cline v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lindhout v. Brochu & HassMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. United States Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sorensen v. Grand Rapids MetalcraftMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API