Legal Opinion

Harland v. Pe Ell State Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1922No. 17372PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

-The Pe Ell State Bank in conducting its business was provided with a vault containing safety deposit boxes for hire, and also a safe kept in its banking room outside of the vault. The entrance to the vault consisted of two thin steel doors, the outer *290one being thicker and stronger than the inner one. The inside door of the vault fastened with lock and key, the outer one locked with bolts inside. The safe was of medium size, having a thick fire-proof door. The inside of it consisted of pigeonholes and a so-called burglar proof steel chest fastened with a combination lock. The bank had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Railroad Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Pacific Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hunter v. Ricke Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sporsem v. First National Bank of PoulsboWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Chaloupka v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Birk v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Haugen v. First National Bank of PoulsboWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API