Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Luckhaupt v. McClelland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1949No. 31578PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In addition to the admission in the affidavit that an appeal had been taken from the Probate Court to the Court of Appeals, counsel for relator in oral argument in this court admitted such procedure had been pursued.

The affidavit of relator admits that the Probate Court exercised discretion. The writ of mandamus will issue to compel the exercise of judicial discretion but not to control it.State, ex rel. Dunphy, v. Graham, Judge, 146 Ohio St. 547,67 N.E.2d 321, and cases cited therein.

The writ of mandamus will not issue as a substitute for an appeal. Shelby v. Hoffman, 7 Ohio St. 450; State,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stein v. SohngenOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Dunphy v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Cook v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Ohio Transit Authority v. Transport Workers Union of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Banaszkewycz v. MerrickOhio Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API