Legal Opinion

Bybee v. Isaac

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2008No. 33251PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This ease arises from a dispute over a covenant not to compete. After trial, the jury found the covenantor, Appellant Denise Isaac, breached the non-compete agreement. Appellants, Isaac and Farm Air, LLC, allege several errors were made below and appeal from the district court’s denial of their alter native motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Denise Isaac owned and operated Dusty’s Flying Service, Inc., a crop dusting business servicing the area around Mountain Home. Isaac sold the company…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Metcalf v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rogers v. Runfola & Associates, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. BOISE TIRE CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Jorgensen v. CoppedgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Wesco Autobody Supply, Inc. v. ErnestIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Harris, Inc. v. Foxhollow Construction & Trucking, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API