Rogers v. Donovan
Oregon Supreme Court
1Concurrence
TONGUE, J.,
specially concurring.
I concur with the result reached by the majority, but not with its reasoning. It is a “familiar rule of statutory construction” that “[e]ommon law terms used in statutes are presumed to have been used in their common law sense.”① It does not necessarily follow, however, as suggested by the majority, that whenever the legislature adopts a statute on a matter which is the subject of a common law rule, this court can first declare that the legislature intended to adopt the common law rule and then “read into” the statute “a restriction not mentioned in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gladden v. LonerganOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Rights to Use of Waters of Silvies RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.