Legal Opinion

Hendren v. Crescent City Seltzer & Mineral Water Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1924No. 9752PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

The relator alleges that his application for an appeal was in time for three reasons:

1st. That Saturday, the 12th, was a legal half-holiday, which cannot be counted as one of the ten days allowed to take the appeal, which fact gave him the whole of Monday, the 14th, within which to file his motion of appeal;

2nd. That the intervening July the 4th was a legal holiday, which must also be eliminated from the ten days; and

3rd. Because Saturday, the 12th, was the tenth or last day on which his appeal could be taken and must not be included in the ten days allowed'to take the appeal. C. P. 318.

I. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. BichowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. John H. Catherwood & Co. v. ShepardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  3. E. J. Hart & Co. v. Nixon & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1873
  4. Tupery v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  5. Willard v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Putnam v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Kelly, Weber & Co. v. F. D. Harvey & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  3. Evans v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Michel Bros. v. MallynnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Christmon v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API