Legal Opinion
Crotty v. Trader
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1996No. A073928PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
John and Alice Crotty (Crotty) move to dismiss William L. Trader’s appeal. We find Trader cannot appeal a reconsideration order and his appeal of the judgment is untimely. He does timely appeal, however, the court’s denial of his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). Accordingly, we grant a partial dismissal.
Background
A jury awarded Crotty $62,500 against Trader and Trader’s business, Trader Inspection Service. The court subtracted the amount paid by other defendants in settlement and ordered Trader to pay $41,402.50 plus costs. The court sent notice of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Passavanti v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Gilberd v. AC TRANSITCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Tunis v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kerns v. CSE Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Reese v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.