Legal Opinion

Wieland v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1990No. C5-89-1592PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Petitioner Mark Wieland appeals from an order of the Redwood County District Court denying his petition for postconviction relief. The petition was based on a claim of newly-discovered evidence. After hearing arguments of counsel and reviewing the deposition of petitioner’s expert, the postconviction court denied petitioner’s request for a new trial. We affirm.

On October 7,1978, a jury found petitioner guilty of first-degree premeditated murder, attempted first-degree murder, and ag gravated assault. See Minn.Stat. §§ 609.-185(1) (1988); 609.17 (1988); 609.225, subd. 2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. BouwmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. BlasusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API