Legal Opinion
Caldwell v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 1984No. C9-83-1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Ronald Caldwell was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery, based on the identification testimony of a sole eyewitness. His request for postconviction relief was based on claims that: (1) his right to confrontation was violated by certain eviden-tiary rulings of the court; (2) his right to due process was violated because of imper-missibly suggestive pretrial identification procedures; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. The District Court denied the petition. We affirm.
ISSUES
1. Was appellant’s constitutional right to confrontation violated…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. SwainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. OcchinoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. GivensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.