Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1921No. 22,610PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $140 for injuries to an automobile. The case was tried before Charles L. Smith, J;, who when plaintiff rested granted defendants’- motion for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff had proved himself guilty of contributory negligence; that he had fathed to prove his cause of action against defendant and that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a verdict for plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $140 for injuries to an automobile. The case was tried before Charles L. Smith, J;, who when plaintiff rested granted defendants’- motion for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff had proved himself guilty of contributory negligence; that he had fathed to prove his cause of action against defendant and that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a verdict for plaintiff. From an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover for damage to his automobile caused by a collision with the defendant company’s street car, through the alleged negligence of defendants. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and from an order granting a new trial upon the ground that the evidence made a case of wilful negligence for the jury, defendants appeal.

*510The Minneapolis Street Railway Company is a corporation operating a street railway system in the city of Minneapolis. J. D. Lane was the motorman on the car in question. The damage occurred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Havel v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Medcalf v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Teal v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Kaiser v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cayuna Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Newton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Carlson v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Charles P. Anderson, Inc. v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API