Legal Opinion

Thomas J. Frisby v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1996No. 94-3819PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the denial of his motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e) for the return of seized property. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the decision of the District Court.

I

On February 2, 1994, a special agent from the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal In vestigation Division (“IRS-CID”) sought a search warrant for plaintiffs home and office. According to the affidavit in support of the warrant application, the IRS-CID had probable cause to believe that plaintiff had violated numerous federal tax laws.

After reviewing the warrant application and the supporting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. James Skip Hulsey v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Jerry Wayne SearpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Kelvin CrumptonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. PritchettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. KufrovichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API