Legal Opinion

Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2006No. 03-5582, 03-5614PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

The Fourth Amendment provides in part that “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or *436things to be seized.” In this case, several agents of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) obtained a search warrant that satisfied the particularity requirements of the Fourth Amendment at the time the magistrate issued the warrant. But by the time the agents conducted the search, a supporting affidavit that was cross-referenced in the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. Harte v. Board Comm'rs Cnty of JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Graves v. Mahoning CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Baranski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API