Legal Opinion

Spitler v. James

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the J asper Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

The appellees brought this action against the appellant, as administrator of the estate of George W. Spitler, deceased, upon a note payable at the Laporte Branch of the Bank of the State of Indiana, executed by Irwin & Hopkins to the said George W. Spitler, during his life, who *203indorsed it to J. & D. S. Eason, by whom it was transferred, by indorsement, to the appellees.

The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first alleges the insolvency of Irwin & Hopkins and of J. & D. S. Eason when the note became due, as an excuse for the failure to sue them.

The second paragraph alleges the transfer of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Putnam v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Deardorff v. ForesmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Magee v. . BadgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Greenvault v. President of the Farmers & Mechanics' BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1847

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wild Cat Branch v. BallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Merritt v. A. W. Boyden & SonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cronkhite v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Emmons v. MeekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Hartington National Bank v. BreslinNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API