Legal Opinion

Hartington National Bank v. Breslin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1910No. 16,196PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Cedar County: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Tills is a suit on a promissory note for $400, dated June 18, 1907, and due six months thence. W. J. Breslin and John Wiebelhans were makers and the Hartigan National Bank was the payee and holder. The snnimons was not served on Breslin and the controversy is between the bank as plaintiff and Wiebelhaus as defendant. From a judgment on the verdict of a jury for the full amount of plaintiff’s claim defendant has appealed.

*48The substance of the defense pleaded is: Defendant and Breslin signed the note, but left a blank for the name of the payee. It was agreed between them, that the note should be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Bank of Pittsburgh v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. Boyd v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  5. Redlich v. . DollNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Tower v. StanleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Consolidated Wagon & Machine Co. v. HousmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Plitt v. KellamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Zier v. Eastern Acceptance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API