Legal Opinion

Hollinger v. Department of Public Welfare of the Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1975No. 950 and 951 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

Before us are preliminary objections by defendants to plaintiffs’ complaints in equity in two closely related cases which we will dispose of in one opinion.

In each case defendants assert a want of jurisdiction in equity because plaintiffs in each case enjoy an adequate remedy at law. Within the context of resolving this issue we accept as true all well-pleaded averments of fact in the respective plaintiffs’ complaints. Bruhin v. Commonwealth, 14 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 300, 320 A.2d 907 (1974). Additionally, a partial stipulation of facts was filed in each case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BROWN v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Bruhin v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Beth Jacob Schools v. Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stackhouse v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. BISLANDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API