Legal Opinion
Bruhin v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 13, 1974No. 722 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
This action in equity has been instituted by three individuals (plaintiffs) who purportedly represent a class composed of persons estimated to be approximately 350 in number, and living in close proximity to the proposed Springfield Mall. The defendants are Jacob G. Kassab, the Secretary of Transportation (Kassab) and Maurice K. Goddard, the Secretary of Environmental Resources (Goddard). The Township of Springfield (Township) was permitted to intervene as a defendant.
This case has essentially grown out of the proposed construction of the Springfield Mall and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Payne v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Powell v. ShepardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Downing v. Erie City School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Reardon v. WilburSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Legman v. Scranton School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Community College v. FoxCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Snelling v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Rupel v. BluesteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Rizzo v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.