Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hubble

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1984No. 144PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

David E. Hubble was tried by jury and convicted of robbery, burglary, theft, criminal conspiracy and three counts of murder in the second degree. 1 On direct appeal from judgments of sentence, Hubble contends that his inculpatory statement was unlawfully obtained and should have been suppressed. We are constrained to agree. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a new trial. 2

“When ruling on suppression motions, the suppression court is required to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether evidence was obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HubbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. HaynesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. Frein, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. GelberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API