Legal Opinion

Lake v. Bonham

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 29, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5375PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

Charlie Lake appeals from an order vacating a decree of dissolution obtained by *600Lake on September 24, 1984, and dismissing the action for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court held that Lake had not been domiciled in this state for 90 days prior to filing the petition as required by A.R.S. § 25-312(1). Joan E. Bonham (Bonham), also known as Joan E. Lake, alleged in her motion to vacate the deeree and dismiss the dissolution action that Lake intended to defraud the court when he swore that he was domiciled in Arizona. The court determined that Lake was not domiciled in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jizmejian v. JizmejianCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Heater v. HeaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. DeWitt v. McFarlandArizona Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alvarado v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Emerman v. Az HoldingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Imh v. ManiatisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API