Legal Opinion

Olsness v. Baird

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBikdzell, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant entered in pursuance of an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The facts alleged in the complaint are substantially as follows: From May 1, 1919 to May 1, 1921, the defendant J. S. Douglas was treasurer of Slope County; as such he was bonded by the State Bonding Fund in the sum of $50,000. During his term of office, he deposited more than $90,000 in the Slope County State Bank of Amidon and in the First State Bank of Amidon in such circumstances as to-break the conditions of his official bond, the banks not being legal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knaffl v. Knoxville Banking & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Barton v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Board of Health v. Teutonia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. Bartholomew v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. Slope County v. DouglasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  2. American Surety Co. of N.Y. v. ClarkeMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  4. Olsness v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API