Olsness v. Baird

Per Ourtam.

This case was submitted with Olsnoss, as Commis sioner of Ins. v. Baird, as Receiver, 52 N. D. 1, 201 N. W. 993, and it was stipulated between-tbe parties that the decision in that case should control this case. Hence, on the authority of that case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

CHRISTIANSON, JOHNSON, NuESSLE, and BlRDZELL, JJ., COUCUr. Beonson, Oh. J., dissents.