Legal Opinion

State v. Lambert

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1902PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Berkeley County. Application by the State, on the relation of D. C. Westen-haver, for writ of mandamus to A. E. Lambert, clerk of the town of Martinsburg. Writ granted, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

POEEENBARGER, JtTDGE:

On the 13th day of May, 1901, the judge of the circuit court of Berkeley County, upon the petition of D. C. Westenhaver, awarded an alternative writ of mandamus directed to A. E. Lambert, clerk of the town of Martinsburg, West Virginia, commanding him to place the name of said petitioner on the official election ballot to be used in the election to be held in said town on the fourth Monday in May, 1901, as a candidate for member of the council of said town, or to appear in answer to the writ on the 16th day of May, and show cause why he should not do so.

On the return day,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Little v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Cleveland v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  5. Wood-Paper Company v. HeftSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Tynes v. ShoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ricketts v. J. G. McCrory Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  5. State v. Board of Commissioners of County of OhioWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API