Legal Opinion

Holder v. Lafayette, Bloomington & Mississippi Ry. Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1873PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. Charles H. Wood, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

In 1867, appellant was elected by the board, of directors, treasurer of the company. He was, at the time, one of the directors. The board never fixed any salary, fees or compensation of the treasurer. He acted from the 1st day of September, 1867, until the 31st day of January, 1872, when he settled with the company, and they allowed him for his services as treasurer during that time, the sum of §4000, and drew a warrant in his favor for that sum on the treasury of the company. A warrant of attorney was given by the companv, and a judgment was subsequently confessed for that amount, in favor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York & New Haven Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Cheeney v. Lafayette, Bloomington & Mississippi Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Henry v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Crumlish's Adm'r v. Cent. Imp. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. v. KneelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Ellis v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. First National Bank v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API