Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Seward

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DYER, Chief Justice.

This case comes on appeal from the judgment of the trial court finding the petitioner, Donald Bryant, entitled to recover under the Workmen’s Compensation Laws of the State of Tennessee.

On August 1, 1968, the petitioner was employed by O. T. Seward, dba, Cudjo’s Cave as a “cave guide.” O. T. Seward leased and operated a tourist attraction at Cumberland Cap, Tennessee, on the Tennessee-Virginia State line. The attraction consisted of Cudjo’s Cave, which is located entirely in Virginia, and a souvenir shop which is also located in Virginia, but includes within its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Smith v. Van Noy Interstate Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Tidwell v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Millican v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hudnall v. S & W Construction Company of Tenn., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Madden v. Holland Group of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Thomas v. Transport Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ray v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Janice Lacroix v. L.W. Matteson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API