Ray v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice.
This is an action for workmen’s compensation benefits resulting from an occupational disease. The primary issue is whether or not the action can be maintained under the workmen’s compensation law of this state.
The facts of the case are undisputed, and the suit was dismissed by the trial court on motion for summary judgment filed by the appellee.
The complaint alleges that appellant was employed by Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation at a job site in New Madrid, Missouri on two different occasions in 1972. It is alleged that the employment was secured through the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. WarrenTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Millican v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
- Brewer v. Pocahontas Fuel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Davis v. Swift & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- Hudnall v. S & W Construction Company of Tenn., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Madden v. Holland Group of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Thomas v. Transport Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Perkins v. BE & K, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Vickery v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.