Legal Opinion

Benton v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1964No. 40381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

C. L. Benton, plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action in the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, to foreclose a laborer’s and materialman’s lien upon the real estate of defendants V. C. Martin and Ollie Martin.

The record discloses that Benny Hill made a contract with the defendants Martin to lease their store building involved herein. As a part of the agreement, Hill agreed to make certain alterations and repairs upon the building to fit it for the use he intended under the lease. Hill orally employed the plaintiff to make…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. SayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Antrim Lumber Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Antrim Lbr. Co. v. MendlikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Deka Development Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. T. J. Stewart Lumber Co. v. DerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hayward Lumber & Investment Company v. GrahamArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bell v. TollefsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Gaddis-Walker Elec. Co., Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Dieterle Plumbing & Heating v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API