Legal Opinion
In re A.B.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 1989No. 87-1092PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
This appeal presents a new question of statutory interpretation under the District of Columbia assault statute, D.C.Code § 22-504 (1981). Appellant A.B., a fifteen-year-old male, was charged as a juvenile delinquent with one count of simple assault for unlawfully assaulting and threatening in a menacing manner A.E., a twelve-year-old girl. D.C.Code §§ 16-2305, 22-504 (1981). The trial judge found appellant guilty based on an unconsented to nonviolent sexual touching where he grabbed and squeezed A.E.’s buttocks on a public street. On appeal appellant contends that the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Ernesto Guarro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Gary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Holt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mungo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Chemalali v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.