Legal Opinion
Parker v. St. Sure
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1931No. Nos. 6573, 6577PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent judge to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in the ease of George D. Parker and Charles E. Evans, Plaintiffs, v. A. Fox, Defendant, and Eby Machinery Company, Intervener, 53 F.(2d) 706 being equity case No. 2401-S, as required by Equity Rule No. 70% (28 USCA § 723) recently adopted by the Supreme Court. It is alleged in the petition that after final hearing the respondent rendered his decision holding the patent involved to be valid but not infringed. It is alleged that respondent filed a memorandum…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Panama Mail Steamship Co. v. VargasSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Kaser Process Pie Co. v. Pie Bakeries of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1931
- International Spotlight Corp. v. United Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hyland v. Millers Nat. Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1932
- Makah Indian Tribe v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1950
- Siano v. HelveringDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1936
- Garland Co. v. FilmerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1932
- Marchus v. DrugeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.