Holland v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for causing the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. There was evidence tending to show that on December 6, 1930, the plaintiff’s intestate purchased of the defendant in Boston a ticket for transportation to Laconia, New Hampshire, and that he boarded a train in Boston at half past four in the afternoon of that day for that destination. The material evidence was that the train consisted of seven cars, five of which were passenger cars and none of which was a Pullman car. The passenger cars were described by the defendant in answer to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Arruda v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Deagle v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Gillis v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Keller v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Jackson v. AnthonyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Peterson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Robert Livingston Pomeroy, of the Estate of Elizabeth Eagan PomeroyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Herman v. SladofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.