Legal Opinion

M. H. Garvey Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 29, 1955No. C. D. 1726PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Olivek, Chief Judge:

This protest relates to certain merchandise which, at the time of importation, was the property of a deceased American citizen. It was originally entered for warehouse and, later, was purchased in bond from the estate by a firm that applied for manipulation of certain items of jewelry. Manipulation of imported merchandise is granted under the provisions of section 562 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, which, so far as pertinent, reads as follows:

Unless by special authority of the Secretary of the Treasury, no merchandise shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Saji & Kariya Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Artgift Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. United States v. Younglove Grocery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manca, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API