Manca, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This protest is before us for decision on the following stipulation:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the merchandise on the invoice covered by the above protest, assessed with duty at 45% ad valorem under paragraph 228 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [as modified], was entered into warehouse as complete microscopes; that on September 15, 1955, application was made on customs form #3499 to manipulate and repack the merchandise; that the application was granted and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- M. H. Garvey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955