Legal Opinion

Denaples v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 2016No. 2074 C.D. 2015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

PRESIDENT JUDGE LEAVITT

Louis A. DeNaples petitions for review of an adjudication ' of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (Board) that denied DeNaples’ request to modify two prior orders of the Board. DeNaples argues that these orders have prevented him and his companies from doing business with the Mount Airy Casino Resort. DeNaples challenges the procedures by which the Board voted to deny his requested relief; the Board’s interpretation of its prior orders; and the propriety of the Board’s prohibitions on his ability to do business in the gaming industry. We affirm.

Background

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Keystone Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation & Natural ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Brown v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Denaples v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Lumania Properties, L.P. v. Planning Comm. of the City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API