Legal Opinion

County of Hennepin v. Ryberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1926No. 25,524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for an accounting, the purpose being to recover from the clerk of court of Hennepin County fees which he has received in naturalization proceedings over a long period of years. The plaintiff contends that such fees are required by law to be paid into the county treasury. Defendant clerk of court and the surety on his official bond, the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, claim on the other hand that the fees belong to the clerk personally. Judgment went for defendants on the pleadings and plaintiff appeals.

The fees have been paid and received under the Act of Congress of June 29,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Mulcrevy, & Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Leighton v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. MulcrevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Eldredge v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. AbbettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Holmes v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Ervin v. Crookston Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Kaplan v. Independent School District of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Smith v. MorrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API