Legal Opinion
Roll v. Janca
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 22, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2203PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONOFRIO, Presiding Judge.
The sole issue in this controversy is whether the trial court abused its discretion under Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60(c), 16 A.R.S., in setting aside a default judgment which had been entered against appellees-defendants Walter T. and Sara F. Janea.
Plaintiff-appellant Roll was allegedly injured on July 23, 1970 in the parking lot of the Janeas’ Half Way House Tavern. On *336September 22, 1970 Roll filed suit against the appellees. Service of process was made on September 30, 1970 by leaving copies of the summons and complaint with the Janeas’ 22-year-old…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Park v. StrickArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. ConlinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Hilgeman v. American Mortgage Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.