Legal Opinion

LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1966No. 6609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANDRY, Judge.

This is a cumulation of actions by three brothers, Murphy, Barton and Peter La-Coste seeking an adjudication of their entitlement to workmen’s compensation benefits for total and permanent disability allegedly resulting from the occupational disease known as silicosis, reputedly contracted in the performance of their duties as sandblasters and painters in the employ of defendant, J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., the insured of defendant, The Travelers Insurance Company.

Defendants filed dilatory exceptions grounded upon an asserted improper cumu-lation of actions which exceptions…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Wright v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  3. Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  4. Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Madison v. American Sugar Refining CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. Lyons v. PirelloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Lacoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API