Legal Opinion

Moore v. Boxman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1969No. 20,497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.

This appeal comes to us from a judgment adverse to appellants (defendants below). An action was brought by appellee Henry F. Boxman against Norris H. Moore and Lucille Moore, appellants, and three insurance companies. The three insurance companies filed answer and interpleader! With the consent of the parties a judgment arid order of interpleader was entered discharging the three insurance companies.

The issues were closed on a third amended complaint, second supplemental complaint, and answers and replies filed thereto.

Trial was to the court without the intervention of a jury. Appellee was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Souerdike v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hamrick v. LoringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Fergus v. WilmarthIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. HEALTH & HOSPITAL CORP., ETC. v. GaitherIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Beneficial Indiana, Inc. v. Joy Properties, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Butterfield Lumber, Inc. v. Peterson Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. Hiatt v. YerginIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API