State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
¶ 1. Isaac H. Williams and Willie Hogan appeal separately from a judgment (Williams) and orders (Williams and Hogan) entered under Wis. Stat. ch. 980, committing them to institutional care pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 980.06 (1999-2000). Their appeals raise identical issues. Accordingly, we consolidate their appeals for decision. We affirm.
I
¶ 2. Both Hogan and Williams contend that two changes made to Wis. Stat. ch. 980 violate their constitutional rights to equal protection and to substantive due process. They also claim that the changes should not be applied to them because the petitions…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Martin Ex Rel. Scoptur v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Ronald KnipferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Marberry v. MacHtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. TainterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. LombardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.