Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Pharm v. Bartow
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 2007No. 2004AP583PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 1. This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals that affirmed the circuit court's order1 denying Frederick *709Lee Pharm's (Pharm) petition for habeas corpus discharge from his commitment pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2003-04).2 Pharm asserts that due to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) and his waivers of extradition for criminal proceedings, Wisconsin was precluded from commencing commitment under ch. 980 following the term of incarceration imposed for crimes committed in Wisconsin.
¶ 2. We conclude that neither the IAD nor Pharm's waivers of extradition under the IAD for…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FunkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Merchant v. State Department of CorrectionsWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- STATE EX REL. FREDERICK LEE PHARM v. BartowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BarrigaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.