People v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Berrien; Coolidge, J. Charles A. Smith was convicted of violating the liquor law.
1Opinion of the Court
Grant, O. J.
Respondent was indicted by a grand jury of Berrien county for keeping his saloon open on Sunday, contrary to section 17 .of the state liquor law (3 How. Stat. § 2283e), tried, and convicted. Two questions are presented: (1) Was the grand jury a legal body? (2) Is the violation of the liquor law of the State an indictable offense ?
The statute is conclusive of the first question. The objections relate to irregularities in the drawing of the jury. The statute specifies what shall be a ground of challenge, viz., that a juror is prosecutor or complainant. It expressly prohibits a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. LauderMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- People v. J. & S. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1837
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
- Gridley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. LayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. ReigelMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.