Legal Opinion

People v. J. & S. Brown

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1837PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the Monroe general sessions. The defendants were indicted for selling spirituous liquors without license. They demurred to the indictment, and the court of general sessions held that the matter charged did not constitute an indictable offence, and accordingly gave judgment for the defendants. The district attorney removed the record into this court by writ of error.

Read the full summary

Error from the Monroe general sessions. The defendants were indicted for selling spirituous liquors without license. They demurred to the indictment, and the court of general sessions held that the matter charged did not constitute an indictable offence, and accordingly gave judgment for the defendants. The district attorney removed the record into this court by writ of error. It was now insisted on behalf of the defendants, and in support of the judgment of the general sessions, that the statute under which the indictment was found contains no express prohibition against the sale of…

1Opinion of the Court

After advisement, this court, by Cowen, J., said that they had considered the point raised by the counsel for the defendants, and were clear in the opinion that there was nothing in it, and accordingly reversed the judgment of the general sessions.

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. Center TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hill v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Dickinson v. OliverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. People v. GilkinsonCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API