Legal Opinion

People v. Lauder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1890PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Certiorari to Wayne to review proceedings resulting in indictment of respondent by a grand jury. (Eeilly, J.) The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

This case comes here upon writ of certiorari issued by this Court to the circuit court for the county of Wayne.

Lauder was indicted by a grand jury of Wayne county. To this indictment he interposed two pleas in abatement. The first plea relates to the composition and legality of the grand jury which found the indictment. The second relates to what is claimed as a violation of the constitutional right of Lauder in being summoned before the grand jury, and being examined by them upon the subject-matter for which he was indicted. The first plea in abatement we hold to be bad, for reasons stated…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. People v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Pierson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. People Ex Rel. Hackley v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  2. Coblentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. United States v. KimballU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
  4. Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API