Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Lottery Commission of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 2004No. 49A02-0310-CV-921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellants-Plaintiffs Tom Smith ("Smith") and George Frankl ("Frankl"), individually and as Class representatives of all others similarly situated, (collectively, "the Class"), appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Defendant the State Lottery Commission ("the Lottery") on the Class's breach of contract claim. 1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Issue

The Class presents a single issue for review, which we restate as follows: whether the trial court erroneously granted summary judgment to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Shambaugh & Son, Inc. v. CarlisleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. American Management, Inc. v. MIF Realty, L.P.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. PriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Tomahawk Village Apartments v. FarrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. West American Insurance v. CatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Johnson & Johnson v. Guidant Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Property-Owners Insurance Co. v. Ted's Tavern, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. George v. V.I. Lottery Comm'nSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
  5. Coffman v. PSI Energy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API