Legal Opinion
Metcalf v. Castle Studios
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 1997No. WD 53520PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPINDEN, Judge.
Castle Studios appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award of workers’ compensation benefits to Amy S. Metcalf. It contends that the commission erred in awarding benefits to Metcalf because it was not subject to the workers’ compensation laws and because competent and substantial evidence did not support the award. We affirm.
Castle Studios’ owner, Nancy Mihalevich, hired Metcalf in September 1987 to work as a hairdresser. On March 14, 1992, Metcalf injured her left arm and wrist. Metcalf filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits asserting that she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fowler v. Baalmann, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Martin v. Mid-America Farm Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Crevisour v. HendrixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- Johnson v. St. John's Mercy Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Herring v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maas v. Treasurer of the StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Phillips v. Par Electrical ContractorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Esquivel v. Day's Inn of BransonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Breeze v. Helm & Sons Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000