Breeze v. Helm & Sons Lumber Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Chief Judge.
The issue is whether Billy Helm, d/b/a Helm & Sons Lumber Co. (“Helm”), had a sufficient number of employees to be qualified as an employer under the Workers’ Compensation Law (the “Act”). The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) held that Helm employed five or more employees, and thus met the definition of “employer” pursuant to § 287.030.1(3)1, 2 and awarded workers’ compensation benefits to Joseph Breeze (“Breeze”). Since Helm had not insured his liability under the Act, the ALJ directed the Second Injury Fund to pay benefits to Breeze. Both Helm and the Second…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gordon v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brown v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Leslie v. School Services & Leasing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Metcalf v. Castle StudiosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Atkinson v. Timothy Peterson/T & P FoundationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Phillips v. Par Electrical ContractorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Busby v. D.C. Cycle Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009