Legal Opinion
Hess v. Sun Ray Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 29, 1956No. Appeal, 354PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action of trespass. The judgment is affirmed on the following excerpts from the able opinion of President Judge Kun :
*200“The evidence in plaintiff’s case Avas rather meagre. It consisted of her OAvn testimony, as folloAvs: On direct examination plaintiff testified that on August 25, 1951, she was about to enter the Sun Eay store located at Frankford Avenue and Orthodox Street, in the City of Philadelphia. She noticed a stand in the entrance-way where a clerk was dispensing orange juice, with about eight or nine people standing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Stais v. Sears-Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Stais v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by11 opinions
- Treadway v. Ebert Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Markle v. Robert Hall ClothesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Dimino v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2007
- Blakely v. St. Marguerite's Mutual Beneficial Society, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2009
- Flank v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.