Legal Opinion

Caido v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 10, 1912No. A-623PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Okfuskee County; John Caruthers, Judge. Mose Caido was convicted of larceny, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDoyee, J.

The plaintiff in error was tried, convicted, and sentenced to serve a term of thirteen months’ imprisonment in the state penitentiary on an information, the charging part of which reads as follows:

“That within said county of Okfuskee and state of Oklahoma, on the 6th day of April, 1909, one Mose Caido unlawfully, fraudulently, stealthily, and feloniously did take, steal and carry away from the possession of the owner, Chas. Puffin, one domestic animal, to wit. one two-year-old heifer calf, without the knowledge or consent of him, the said Chas. Puffin, and with the felonious intent of him,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Barbe v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jarman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Rhoades v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Cowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Akers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API