Legal Opinion

Bradley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1929No. A-7208PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Cleveland county of the crime of larceny of chickens in the nighttime, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for four years. Motion for new trial was filed, overruled, and exceptions saved, and the cause is now on appeal in this court.

The defendant complains, that the court erred in refusing to sustain the demurrer of the defendant to the state’s evidence. There is really no such thing as a demurrer to the evidence in a criminal case in Oklahoma. When the state rests, if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Nail v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Caido v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Hufford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API